Jim Stoppani SUED by Bodybuilding.com! (Update: Court Dates Set)

If you thought the ongoing Jim Stoppani Scandal couldn’t get any crazier, then think again.

On June 22, 2016, Bodybuilding.com filed a lawsuit against Jim Stoppani and PhD Fitness LLC! While this has nothing to do with the aforementioned scandal involving PRO Jym, NutraBio, and other companies affected by Stoppani’s recent claims on YouTube, the timing is rather interesting.

Don’t feel like reading legal documents? Then watch Mike’s discussion with what we know as of September 21, 2016:

Subscribe to PricePlow on YouTube

UPDATED September 19, 2016: JYM is now being sold in GNC, so many are asking what’s going on. Click here to skip to the 2016-Q3 update — in short, it looks like this is heading to court and business is moving forward for all parties until then.

UPDATED September 20, 2016: Bodybuilding.com has released a statement regarding the matter, and Jim posted a video as well.

UPDATED September 22, 2016: The case has been amended and Bodybuilding.com is now suing GNC as well as Stoppani!

What happened?

According to the complaint filed by Bodybuilding.com, which are allegations and have not been proven in a court of law, the scenario has played out like this:

  • Jim Stoppani Lawsuit

    Jim Stoppani and PhD Fitness own “JYM Supplement Science” trademark on the nearly useless Supplemental Register, but what about “JYM”??? Up to the courts and arbitrators to decide now…

    Around March 2013, Bodybuilding.com claims to have created the mark “JYM” for use in connection with supplements bearing that name. Note, however, neither party formally trademarked the name at that time.
  • On May 17, 2013, Bodybuilding.com and Jim Stoppani entered an agreement over the development, marketing, and sale of products bearing the JYM mark. Stoppani would endorse it with his name and likeness, and Bodybuilding.com would pay PhD Fitness a flat-fee royalty for each sale of a JYM-branded product.
  • Shortly thereafter, Bodybuilding.com began promoting and selling products with the JYM mark on the labeling and marketing.
  • Bodybuilding.com’s then alleges that Stoppani himself commented that “I had not even seen the JYM logo or even the concept that [Bodybuilding.com] had sketched out, but all I heard all day from [a fellow PhD Fitness representative] was how brilliant the concept was that [Bodybuilding.com] had come up with.” around July, 2013.
  • Based upon the above points, Bodybuilding.com claims that they own the trademark rights in the JYM mark
  • The agreement in the second bullet point expired May 17, 2016, with a few surviving terms (not disclosed in the complaint filed).
  • On April 19, 2016, PhD Fitness sent a letter to Bodybuilding.com disputing ownership of the JYM mark, stating that PhD Fitness owns it. They claim that Bodybuilding.com’s right also terminates on May 17, 2016. We do not have this letter and cannot verify it!
  • Bodybuilding.com is now taking it to the courts, seeking a declaratory judgement that they are the rightful owners of the “JYM” mark. “An immediate, real, and justiciable controversy exists” between both parties that must get settled.

Both sides reached for comment

NutraIngredients was able to reach both parties for comment:[1]

Liberty Media, the company that owns most of Bodybuilding.com, stated,

“Bodybuilding.com recently filed a lawsuit against PhD Fitness, LLC and Jim Stoppani with regard to use of the JYM trademark. Bodybuilding.com’s relationship with Jim Stoppani evolved over many years into a formal business partnership, which included developing and jointly promoting the JYM brand, sold exclusively by Bodybuilding.com for the past three years.”

“While we do not comment on pending litigation, it is our hope that we can continue this mutually beneficial relationship going forward. In the interim, JYM products will continue to be available on the Bodybuilding.com website.”

— Bodybuilding.com / Liberty Media[1]

Stoppani, on the other hand, stated on the phone with NutraIngredients,

“It’s very unfortunate that Bodybuilding.com has taken this stance on the trademarks and brand. Given my background in the industry, as a scientist, expert and consultant it’s ludicrous to say that I did not formulate my own products.”

“I had a great relationship with Bodybuilding.com and hope to continue to work with them, but the plan was always to make the products available to as many people as possible and go to GNC, Amazon and others [once the development agreement expired on May 17, 2016].”

“These products championed non-proprietary blends based on real research. They’re my formulations, and my IP.”

“JYM Supplement Science is not a brand,” he added. “It’s an extension of what I do, who I am, what I teach. The brand is me.”

— Jim Stoppani, PhD Fitness[1]

So who owns JYM!??!

The way we currently see it, JYM is not a “brand” in the formal sense — as in, it is not a company or government-recognized entity.

JYM is a ‘mark’, one that Bodybuilding.com claims they began using for themselves, yet didn’t officially trademark when they started promoting it.

So the question for the courts is, who owns the “JYM” mark!?

JYM Lawsuit

Who owns this logo and the “JYM” mark?! It’s not as simple as you’d think…

Due to prior use, an argument could be made that Bodybuilding.com created it, unless Stoppani has proof (such as in some old email) that he created it first.

However, PhD Fitness did attempt to trademark “JYM”,[2] and Bodybuilding.com either chose not to object, or didn’t catch it happening — but either way — it was refused.

Also note that Jim Stoppani and PhD Fitness earlier trademarked “JYM Supplement Science”, but that is not what’s at hand here and that’s only in the Supplemental Register (see next section). This is about “JYM” and the logo you see on those tubs.

Supplemental Registerr Updates

Updated September 21, 2016: Some new evidence has come to light!

It turns out that on December 20, 2013, PhD Fitness attempted to register “JYM Supplement Science”.[4] This is earlier than any other date we had seen, but still not prior to the Bodybuilding.com agreement.

HOWEVER, that application was denied on April 7, 2014. The examining attorney at the US Patent and Trademark Office stated it was “merely descriptive”, and that “Since each word in applicant’s mark is descriptive or generic, registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).”.[5]

It was then amended and accepted,[6] but only in the Supplemental Register, which is not nearly as useful as the Principal Register.

Also note that other parties have no recourse to oppose Supplemental Registration other than to seek its cancellation after the fact, which they’ll likely attempt to do if this doesn’t settle. That could be why PhD used the Supplemental Register, but we aren’t sure about that.

The evidence was the enemy

Bodybuilding vs JYM

What did PhD Fitness need to use to get “JYM Supplement Science” approved in the supplemental register as “proof of commerce”? Bodybuilding.com’s OWN product page! Not good! Image courtesy USPTO[4]

But… guess what PhD had to use as evidence to show that it was already used in commerce? Bodybuilding.com’s own product page!!

This all could be bad news for Jim, but the #JYMArmy may appreciate the fact that he was indeed attempting to trademark it earlier than we thought.

Lessons learned

Trademark your brand names and product names, everyone! Especially when entering joint partnerships with other people and companies!

Even if Bodybuilding.com is right, and they had first use, this probably could have been avoided had they paid the $250-750 and just trademarked it right away. As small business owners, we sometimes let this get away from us, thinking that owning the domain or prior-use is good enough (which it often is).

Large companies like Bodybuilding.com don’t have that excuse, and now everyone’s going to be spending a ton in legal fees and unnecessary drag-through-the-mud drama.

The revenue numbers are monumental

Updated November 19, 2016: In a new post titled What’s JYM Really Worth? The Numbers You Won’t Believe, we use court documents to demonstrate how huge of a case this is. Simply put, the numbers are not small — this case is the real deal.

Jim’s Formulations and IP?!

Pro JYM vs. Protogen

These two labels look way too familiar. Did someone just take the Protogen formula, cut it by 20%, remove the digestive enzymes, and then raise the price for Pro JYM?!?!?!?!? (It seems like the answer is indeed YES, if this sworn affidavit is true).

Jim may have also opened another can of worms here. By going on the record stating that he formulated the products, he may be starting more disputes, as there are currently questions regarding the extreme similarities between Bodybuilding.com’s Protogen formula (which has been around since 2012, possibly earlier) vs. Pro JYM, as discussed at the end of our Jim Stoppani Scandal article.

Bodybuilding.com States Who Really Formulated Pre-JYM

(Updated on October 4, 2016)

In a sworn affidavit, a Bodybuilding.com employee has stated that Jim Stoppani did approach their team with a pre workout supplement before they began working together, it was an awful formula that smelled and tasted offensive, was underdosed, and did not mix well. He states that he then changed nearly every ingredient, adding and removing a few others.

You can read about it in our post titled Meet the Man Who REALLY Formulated Pre-JYM

Suspicious Timing

Now here’s what’s even crazier. If you timestamp the termination dates of those agreements with the dates of Jim’s questionable videos that led to the Jim Stoppani Scandal article… as well as the filing date of this lawsuit… you’ll notice that a lot of this all happened around the same timeframe.

It’s probably just a coincidence, but this is all just too weird.

This feels like the star quarterback and prom queen power couple in high school are breaking up in dramatic fashion, and it’s sending shockwaves to the rest of the social circle. Meanwhile, all of the smart money is off going to college and elsewhere anyway (ie, to Amazon). What a year.

Fall 2016 Updates: Court Dates are SET!

Added September 19, 2016:

Stack3d recently reported that JYM is now being sold in GNC,[3] so many of you asked what is going on, and if this case had settled. The answer is NO, this case has not settled. Quite the opposite, in fact.

We jumped on PACER and found the judge’s SCHEDULING ORDER from August 24, 2016:

Court dates are set! Click here to see the judge’s Scheduling Order

So the judge is ordering Bodybuilding.com to disclose their expert witnesses by March 15, 2017, JYM to disclose theirs on April 15, 2017, and then all rebuttal experts by May 1, 2017.

A jury trial is then set for January 16, 2018 in Boise, Idaho. Yes, the justice system takes that long.

But JYM is in GNC now?!

Typically, you don’t let court cases stop the course of business. It is of our non-lawyer opinion that GNC is doing their thing, and if Jim Stoppani / JYM Supplement Science loses this court case, that will just add to the his damages owed to Bodybuilding.com.

Point being? There is a lot riding on this, and JYM seems to have gone all in. This is huge, it’s rumored to have gotten ugly, and it doesn’t sound like it’s going to end amicably. Not one bit.

Bodybuilding.com CEO Releases a Statement

On September 20, 2016, Bodybuilding.com released this statement, which they later updated on September 22 to reflect their lawsuit against GNC.

The general gist is that the JYM products at the “other retailer” (presumably at GNC) are unauthorized and manufactured without Bodybuilding’s permission, and Bodybuilding is now considering further lawsuits against GNC and any GNC franchise who carries these “new JYM” products.

The two paragraphs of most importance are,

The JYM products available on Bodybuilding.com are genuine, safe, FDA compliant, and have the same high quality standards since we launched the brand three years ago. JYM products being sold by other retailers were not authorized by Bodybuilding.com and are being sold without our permission.

Bodybuilding.com’s policy is to not comment on pending litigation, but we will vigorously enforce our trademarks and intellectual property rights. That said, I can emphasize this: Bodybuilding.com has sued the former celebrity endorser and the retailer, and is evaluating its legal options with respect to the retailer’s individual franchisees and any other retailer who tries to sell JYM products without our express written permission.

— Richard Jalichandra & The Bodybuilding.com Team [emphasis ours]

Jim Stoppani’s Response

Jim weighed in as well, with a video posted to Facebook and Youtube:

This turns the intensity level on the situation up to about a 9.5 10 and you know damn well we’ll keep this one up to date.

Like this Post? We have more on the way…

PricePlow is a price comparison site that asks one simple question: is this worth it?

The honest truth lives here. Follow us on social media below:

References

  1. Daniells, Stephen, “Bodybuilding.com files lawsuit over JYM mark”; NutraIgnredients-USA.com; http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Manufacturers/Bodybuilding.com-files-lawsuit-over-JYM-mark
  2. “JYM”; Trademarkia; https://trademarks.justia.com/868/15/jym-86815808.html, November 15, 2015
  3. Stack3d; “Jim Stoppani’s Jym Supplement Science now available at GNC”; stack3d.com/2016/09/; September 16, 2016
  4. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn86149967&docId=FTK20131224075131#docIndex=12&page=1
  5. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn86149967&docId=OOA20140407123659#docIndex=9&page=1
  6. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn86149967&docId=ORC20140701010817#docIndex=0&page=1
Posted in , by Mike | Tagged , , , , , , , , .
  • Dodastankyleg

    THANK YOU for finally shedding light to the public with this! I have been saying this for years. Jym has been manufactured and distributed exclusively by its majority owner none other than bodybuilding which has pivoted its entire business platform to lean heavier in its exclusive offerings. Jim stoppani is merely the celebrity athlete namesake that provides marketing content for jym supplement science. He does not control the development, raw material procurement, manufacturing or dostribution. Only the marketing! Ever wonder why you never see jym sold anywhere else?! Because it’s owned by bbcom! This whole “jym army” is nonsense. You have been overpaying a 30% price increase on double doses of everyday common products! Ever wonder why there is a huge scoop and and low serving size in jym pre? Cause it’s simply two servings of most common dosings of comparable pre workouts at a 30% price increase per serving. thank you for finally shedding light on this. I have been waiting for an authority to write on this for 3 years now.

    • Tierry Henry

      You are a moron… You think Dr. Stoppani, world renowned expert, didn’t formulate his own products? He only has been writing about whats in his products for more than a decade now at M&F. A celebrity athlete? I think you are mistaking a real scientist with other people in this industry bud. Do yourself a favor and educate yourself and realize that the supplement industry is a shit show.

      • DawnWeiner

        Dude have you read the lawsuit docs? Jim is a good trainer and has great programs but the Jym brand was/is a sham. It’s the bb .com house brand… Read up on it. We were all mislead. I’m done with bb .com and stoppani… His credibility is shot.

      • jerry pastcho

        Where can i see those docs bud? That’s crazy

  • Charles Curry

    This is all wrong. “Formal registration doesn’t matter” in the case of first use trademarks. Neither party will win the rights to “Jym” because its a word mark first of all and has the pseudomark of “gym” which cannon be trademarked. The design of “Jym” doest matter, its pronounced “gym.” Sounds and words take president over design marks. Stopanni owns the rights to “Jym supplement science” and has for years but anyone can legally slap “Jym” on any container and nothing can be done about it. In any font type.

    Bodybuilding .com doesnt own “jym supplement science” mark. Its already registered to Jim’s company.

    Often people this federal registration or an actual logo makes a mark “owned by someone” or unique. It doesnt. Who ever wrote this and both parties need to go back and read and learn the Act governing tradmarks.

    Im 100% sure im correct

    – Charles “Chuck Diesel” Curry.

    • saywutrly

      Here is some input I would trust. This man is another force in the business of honest and better-for-the-body supplements. Thanks for Dieselade, Chuck. It’s an excellent product. (I’m saywutrly on AM forum)

  • CT Kaupp

    If we can trust Mr. Stoppani…who the effff can we trust in the supplement industry? :( I’ve been an avid follower of Jim’s for the past 4-5yrs.