Bodybuilding.com is SUING GNC for a Minimum of 100 MILLION Dollars!

Grab a seat folks, because this is happening.

Today while checking PACER, we saw that there was a Motion to Correct/Amend the Jim Stoppani Lawsuit. Had the two sides reached a settlement???

Not. Even. Close.

Instead,

Bodybuilding.com has amended the lawsuit to include GNC, and they are seeking $100,000,000 in damages

You can download the amended lawsuit below:

This is not a joke nor a drill. The two behemoths are about to clash.

Bodybuilding.com vs. GNC LAWSUIT

This is actually happening. 2016 never ceases to deliver.

The Lawsuit Bullet Points

Bodybuilding vs GNC JYM

The first of six pages of evidence showing how GNC’s JYM 2.0 products violate Bodybuilding.com’s marks

It seems that the points against Jim Stoppani remain the same (read about them here). The changes include GNC:

  • Bodybuilding.com is seeking $100,000,000 in damages. (Page 19)
  • Bodybuilding.com is seeking cancelation of Trademark No. 4,561,658 (“JYM Supplement Science”)
  • Bodybuilding.com has named “DOES 1-100” — These are “John Doe’s” to be named in the future, and we assume they are reserved for any individual franchisees or other stores who dare sell any JYM Product.
  • The complaint includes comparisons of the new “JYM 2.0” labels as evidence that Bodybuilding.com’s JYM mark has been violated.
  • Bodybuilding.com’s lawyers caught Jim Stoppani using his website to state that his products won the Bodybuilding.com Award of Excellence, but now show the new GNC JYM 2.0 pictures (new products that never won any such awards!) — a major conflict of interest. Basically, he got caught only half-updating his site.
  • Bodybuilding.com claims to have sent warnings to both GNC and JYM about this (presumably during the summer), and those warnings clearly went unheeded.

Advice to GNC franchisees and other stores:

Due to the third point, we strongly recommend anyone considering selling JYM supplements, or making a Pre-JYM knockoff, to seriously reconsider. Bodybuilding.com is clearly not in a joking mood today, and their employees have now submitted sworn affidavits stating that Bodybuilding.com formulated Pre-JYM, not Jim Stoppani.

Will this case settle?

In the video posted on September 21, Mike stated that he believes this will settle — “there can’t be a black cloud hanging over our heads for a whole year”. We aren’t so sure this is going to happen anymore.

GNC may wish to settle since they’re a publicly traded company, but the feud between Stoppani and Bodybuilding.com seems to be deep. Once again, everyone’s chips are 100% all-in.

This video was posted before word of the GNC amendment to the lawsuit:

Subscribe to PricePlow on YouTube

Bodybuilding.com has also updated the statement on their page, now stating the fact that they’re suing GNC.[1]

Follow-Up Evidence Posted:

Since posting this, we’ve unearthed additional information and evidence in sworn affidavits:

  1. Meet the Man Who REALLY Formulated Pre-JYM – Posted on October 4, 2016
  2. Who Owns JYM? This Email Evidence May Make the Case – Posted on October 6, 2016
  3. What’s JYM Really Worth? The Numbers You Won’t Believe – Posted on November 19, 2016

We are yet to reach GNC for comment.

Like this Post? We have more on the way…

PricePlow is a price comparison site that asks one simple question: is this worth it?

The honest truth lives here. Follow us on social media below:

References

  1. Bodybuilding.com; “A Few Words About The JYM Brand”; Updated September 22, 2016; http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/a-few-words-about-the-jym-brand.html
Posted in , by Mike | Tagged , , , , , , , .
  • Ken

    I am not sure why GNC would get involved with this. Maybe they are also manufacturing for JYM 2.0?

    • saywutrly

      I feel like there’s something big of which we are not yet aware. I’m no lawyer, and I have no experience running public companies. I have, however, invested in the stock market for a number of years and seen the differences in public companies. GNC is a publicly traded company with a large responsibility to their stockholders as well as their franchisees. They are run (at the top) by folks who are at very least bean counters first and athletes in a far second. They’re also an established and mature company with plenty of funds, established legal counsel, and other experts at their disposal to do this properly. They are also the only vested party who has made no public statements regarding this. In before they drop their bombshell!

  • Atom

    F BBcom. They are just pissed because he branched out.