Glutathione is an important and powerful antioxidant used to prevent oxidative stress and damage to cells in everything from winemaking to skincare products. Too much oxidative stress, caused by free radicals in the bloodstream, is linked to heart disease, Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, chronic fatigue, depression, and more. Since exercise can also temporarily increase oxidative stress — contributing to soreness and fatigue — athletes should also be interested in preventing its prolonged release.
Glutathione isn’t orally bioavailable – is there a better “carrier”?
The benefits of glutathione supplementation would seem obvious – but until recently, due to its poor oral bioavailability, if you wanted a glutathione supplement you’d have to schedule an IV drip at your local naturopathic or alternative medicine clinic.
Some are hoping that to change soon, due to a new “performance blend” of glutathione and L-Citrulline manufactured by Kyowa Hakko, makers of Cognizin citicoline and Sustamine L-Glutamine. A new study suggests it may have additional benefits for athletes.
But unfortunately, upon closer look, we have some serious concerns with the way this study was configured.
The new Baylor Glutathione Citrulline Performance Study
The double-blind study, conducted at Baylor University with funding from Kyowa Hakko, suggested that a blend of glutathione and L-citrulline, marketed under the name Setria Performance Blend, may increase lean body mass – but only temporarily!
75 male participants were given either 2.2g Setria Performance Blend, 2g L-citrulline-malate, or 2.52g placebo for eight weeks of resistance training, then measured for changes in lean mass and 1RM (one rep max) on the bench and leg press. (HINT! Read the last sentence again. Can you find the confound?) The researchers hypothesized that the glutathione would help prevent oxidative stress while synergizing with the ergogenic effects of the l-citrulline. This would allow it to stay in the bloodstream longer for increased nitric oxide uptake into the muscles, which would in turn lead to an increase in strength and lean body mass via more efficient muscle protein synthesis.
Better gains after 4 weeks…
After four weeks, the researchers reported an increase in muscle mass and bench press and leg press strength for all three groups. The researchers went on to note that the most significant difference in strength and lean mass was in the group supplementing with Setria Performance Blend – a greater increase in strength and lean body mass than either the group receiving the placebo or the group receiving citrulline malate alone.
…but things even out after another 4
However, after another four weeks of testing, the gap had closed, leading to no statistically significant difference in lean body mass, fat mass, or water retention between the groups. Additionally, there was no noticeable difference in strength between the three groups – even from those with greater lean body mass!
The researchers speculated that the increased lean body mass was due to more efficient muscle protein synthesis from the less-degraded l-citrulline in the bloodstream. The benefits of l-citrulline are well-documented.
The confound: a lower dose of citrulline malate?!
However, different forms of l-citrulline were used between the groups, so it’s tough to say for sure how the glutathione made a difference! Realize that citrulline malate contains roughly 56.6% citrulline, so we’re really comparing 2.2g Setria (consisting of 200mg glutathione + 2g L-citrulline) against 1.13g citrulline (the rest being malic acid).
Why not compare apples against apples? Why use citrulline malate, which yields a lower dose of citrulline? This alone obfuscates anything you can hope to gleam from the study.
Instead, the researchers were also unsure why the gap closed after an additional four weeks of study, but offered the explanations that the different groups may not have been eating enough to get the full benefit of their training, or, conversely, had overtrained.
Further drawbacks of this study
Beyond the citrulline malate confound, remember that Kyowa Hakko funded the study, and one of their employees also designed the experiment, performed the statistical analysis, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript! Flashbacks to the government’s cover-up of DMAA’s basis in nature, anybody?
Meanwhile, the data doesn’t really back up the conclusions nor the headlines in other trade magazines – the correlations really aren’t that strong between the different groups and its rather sporadic.
The fact that the lean body mass decreased from four to eight weeks in the Setria and placebo groups suggests bad experimental design (the researchers hypothesized “eating less” and “over-reaching”) — these variables should be better accounted for in a proper study.
Meanwhile, nothing interesting happened in the strength category — nobody had statistically significant gains in bench press, and everyone had similar increases in leg press that were not significantly different from each other.
Overall, there are just too many red flags here to take this study seriously.
Previous three-phase study showed similar “mixed” results
This follows a three-phase study performed by the same Baylor / Kyowa Hakko team (Sarah McKinley-Barnard, Tom Andre, Kyowa Hakko’s Masahiko Morita, and Darryn S. Willoughby) that was published in 2015. In that study, the third phase — performed on humans for seven days — actually did compare L-citrulline alone vs. L-citrulline + glutathione, measuring nitric oxide, nitrite, and cGMP levels.
The results were mixed, at best. For instance, when measuring nitric oxide levels immediately post workout, citrulline alone actually outperformed citrulline + glutathione, and several other parameters failed to reach statistical significance.
All things considered, this leads us to wonder if this whole glutathione + citrulline idea is simply just a dead end when it comes to actual human performance. In theory, it’s good. In rats, it’s good. In reality, nothing noticeably interesting really seems to be happening.
Why not just take NAC?
Alternatively, you could take a large quantity of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC), a precursor to glutathione that helps your body produce more. It turns out that NAC supplementation enhances muscle cysteine and glutathione levels and prevents fatigue during endurance training in athletes, which may seem like a more bioavailable solution in the first place.
NAC and Nitric Oxide don’t play well for performance
However, NAC has its own limitations, which is why glutathione supplementation is still being explored. Not only does NAC alone not appear to help muscle protein synthesis or nitric oxide metabolism like Setria Performance Blend was hoped to, some studies also suggest that NAC may inhibit the body’s nitric oxide production by interfering with the absorption of nitrite in the kidneys! Finding an appropriate “carrier” for glutathione could still have benefits, but due to the confounds in this study, we cannot yet be sure that citrulline is that molecule.
More — and better — research is required
Clearly more research is needed, but the implications of an orally bioavailable version are exciting and we hope someone can nail it someday soon. However, the citrulline / citrulline malate confound makes this study practically useless, even for those who are looking for a solid four weeks of “beginner gains” per the headlines.
No doubt, Setria can be useful because L-citrulline is useful, but is this glutathione really doing anything? We just don’t know until there’s a true 1:1 comparison and less conflicted research.
Until then, we are not impressed.
Citrulline - Deals and Price Drop Alerts
Get Price Alerts
No spam, no scams.
Disclosure: PricePlow relies on pricing from stores with which we have a business relationship. We work hard to keep pricing current, but you may find a better offer on your own.
Posts are sponsored in part by the retailers and/or brands listed on this page.