The destruction occurred on July 2, 2013 at the company’s warehouse in Dallas, TX, which we can only imagine was a sad, sad day in USPLand.
This comes as a moderate surprise in the never-ending DMAA saga – Exactly three months ago, we broke the news that USPLabs was halting production of all DMAA-based products. Apparently, they still had quite the stockpile, which has been selling at the online stores listed on our Jack3d and OxyELITE Pro pages.
Distribution of remaining stock leads to FDA “Detainment”
It was that decision made months ago — to keep selling what was left in stock — that got USP into its next pot of hot water. The FDA, which disagrees with USPLabs’ stance on the products, issued a detainment order for the products and asked USP to destroy them.
We can only imagine what the issuance of a “detainment order” is… but one thought that comes to mind is a team of DEA agents with loaded AK’s pounding the doors in…
According to the FDA’s regulations,
Administrative detention provides a means through which FDA can hold adulterated or misbranded food and prevent it from reaching the marketplace, thus further enhancing FDA’s ability to ensure the safety of food for U.S. consumers.
Emphasis ours. See source  for more information on detainment, which was brought to you courtesy of the Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002.
Get it while you can…While casual consumers have long thought that these products were illegal and unavailable, the opposite is actually the truth. DMAA was never outright banned by the FDA, and the stores listed in the links above still carry them.
That said, with $8 million worth of the supplements now off the table, the existing stock will certainly dwindle far faster than expected or hoped. So if you are a fan who follows the label and dosing instructions, now is definitely the time to stock up. Once it’s gone, it’s really gone this time.
GNC Under Similar Fire
GNC has been on USP’s side the entire time, which has brought the ire of the FDA as well. Federal prosecutors procured authorization from two state judges to seize over 3,000 cases worth of DMAA-containing products from their warehouses in Pittsburgh and Anderson, SC.
GNC’s spokesman, Greg Miller, believes that their seizure was retaliation for their public backing of USPLabs and DMAA over the past year:
“Given this situation, it is hard to view this action as anything other than a biased agency action against GNC in retaliation for GNC’s stance on DMAA.”
— Greg Miller, GNC Spokesman
Were the FDA’s actions even legal?
Before I go any further, allow me to note that I am not a lawyer, nor is any employee of mine. We are not affiliated with USPLabs in any way, shape, or form. This site does not physically sell any products, nor do we warehouse or distribute them.
That said, let’s take a look at the following points:
DMAA is not outright banned.
The FDA’s director of dietary supplement programs has merely stated that “We don’t want consumers using the products. We think they present a risk to public health”.
There are surely plenty of things the FDA doesn’t “want”, and plenty of things they “think”. But that does not make a law. That does not make a fact.
And the fact is, DMAA has never been proven to be the stimulant that has caused anybody health problems when used properly per the label. That is the truth.
But it gets far hairier than that.
In fact, the above points really don’t mean much in the legal scheme of the situation. The process went something like this:
- USPLabs claims DMAA is natural, as it is a constituent of geranium Pelargonium graveolens.
Because of this, the FDA claims that DMAA cannot be marketed as a dietary supplement.The FDA claims that it is not compliant under DSHEA, as several studies haven’t found DMAA in other geranium plants, and the organization did not see proper procedure in the studies that USPLabs references.
It’s currently extremely ambiguous as to who carries the burden of proof.
The FDA says “No, you prove it.” USP says “Here’s proof. You prove that it isn’t.” The FDA says “That proof isn’t good enough. Here’s some other geranium plants that don’t have it.”
This game can go on forever no matter how powerful your science is – because there is a massive variance in any plant’s constituent content. Based upon what region it’s in, the exact genetic lineage, the soil conditions, the hydration status, temperature control, etc etc.. the plants all behave differently.
So, as it stands to the FDA — and that’s what is currently the “law” being enforced — DMAA is not illegal, but it is illegal for use as a dietary supplement, due to the lack of NDI (new dietary ingredient) paperwork that they find acceptable.
There is no NDI on DMAA… Because it was sold before 1994
Patrick Arnold undoubtedly brought 1,3 DMAA back to the market, as it had been sold by Eli Lilly from the 1940s up through the 1980s (the FDA’s own words)
Since it had been sold before 1994, it was exempt from requiring NDI according to the FDA’s regulations.
But was Eli Lilly using it as a supplement? Maybe not, but geranium oil was. So let’s get into that..
Geranium Oil is GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) Exempt
And by extension, all of geranium oil’s constituents are exempt as well.
Again, we come back to the argument – does DMAA come from any geranium oil?
And again, we come to the question of the burden of proof.
Are Jack3d and OxyELITE Pro adulterated or misbranded?
The products contain 1,3 Dimethylamylamine HCL, and their labels state it as such.
But are they misbranded as supplements? That is where the FDA stands.
So in the end, it all really comes down to whether or not this stuff is truly natural, and in the FDA’s eyes, there’s never been proof beyond the shadow of a doubt.
It’s just one nasty, long legal case, and this post has probably touched upon 10% of it. It’s all in a very gray area in terms of the laws, and it was getting to the point where it simply wasn’t worth fighting for.
This gray area is the current battleground, and one that USPLabs helped to push.
…But what was USP going to do?
At this point, after this whole mess, it was just time to let go. If USP fought this one, things likely would have gone down like this:
- Spend $2-3 million fighting the FDA in courts and funding more third-party studies on geranium Pelargonium graveolens, with a high probability of losing anyway.
- Enrage the FDA, bringing on other “witch hunts” and “random inspections” that would likely yield several financial sanctions, based upon bylaws that you and I could hardly imagine.
- Bring further bad press
Since USP was done manufacturing the products anyway, it was time to call it a loss. To our knowledge, they had really never been fined much, so let’s consider this $8M destruction their final fine and call it a day.
Fighting in the gray area – Respect to USPMany casual fans have claimed USP should have done more to fight the FDA. They certainly could have done this – the detainments can last only 30 days maximum (while authorities determine to press charges or take further actions), which gave them a chance for a final fight.
But what you need to realize is that they were the only company to stand up for their rights (and the industry in general), and went 1000X further than any other company did when the violations came out in spring of 2012. They stepped into what they knew was a gray area, and at least held the line.
They deserve respect for their fight, and have done nothing but take it on the chin in terms of negative mainstream press and lost revenues. In a way, they kept the FDA at bay and forced them to work within the confines of their own laws. This pushback has provided a sort of balance to the ambiguous laws the industry works within.
- DMAA in Dietary Supplements, FDA.gov
- Guidance for Industry: What You Need to Know About Administrative Detention of Foods, FDA.gov
- $8M in dietary supplements containing DMAA destroyed, USAToday.com
- Supplements Called Risky Are Destroyed, NYTimes.com
- U.S. Moves to Seize Dietary Supplement From GNC Warehouses, NYTimes.com
- Response Letter to USP Labs LLC Concerning DMAA, FDA.gov
- New Dietary Ingredients in Dietary Supplements – Background for Industry, FDA.gov
- CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21