New Body Fortress Whey Protein Formula is Still Confusing

Body Fortress has released a new Super Advanced Whey Protein formula, which has come from the wake of the class action lawsuit filed against them, due to allegations of amino acid spiking to the point of deception.

Great news, right? “We inspired industry change!” was our first thought.

Unfortunately… no. Not much has changed.

In fact, this product is possibly worse than the original, depending on how you look at it!

Body Fortress is still adding free form amino acids to the product, and the label is still extremely confusing.

Comparing the two labels

First, to the left, you’ll see the original formula. To the right, the new formula. Click the images for a close-up.

Body Fortress Whey Protein Ingredients - Original Formula

The original formula. Note you get 30g “protein” and 7g of carbs

Body Fortress Whey Protein Ingredients - New Formula

The New Formula. Now we have “20g protein” (not sure if that includes the Super Recovery Blend) and 6g carbs!

The boxes and annotations in red, yellow, and orange are our own.

The new label was taken from the PDF linked from Body Fortress’s site.[2,3]

Our question to Body Fortress

We have a few questions we’d like them to answer, which you can see on both Facebook and Twitter.

The most important questions are:

  • How much actual whey protein is in each scoop?
    • Does the 20g of protein in the “Supplement Facts” section include the 3g Super Recovery Blend?

Update: Body Fortress has responded on Facebook… but unfortunately did not answer the question. Stay tuned!

We’ll update this post once those questions are answered. Body Fortress is not legally required to disclose the first question to the public, but the second question does have potential legal implications discussed below

Our analysis and notes of the new Super Advanced Whey Protein formula

  • It still includes free form amino acids… and continues to confuse consumers!

    The new formula still has 3g of amino acid “spiking” (in the Super Recovery Blend), which is admittedly “open labeled”.

    That said, it’s still confusing:

    • We’re unsure if the new formula is counting the 3g of Super Recovery Blend into the 20g protein on the label.

      Legally, they should actually include it, per FDA guideline 21 CFR 101.9(C)(iii) 7.[1] Because of that guideline, we’re going to assume that the 3g of Super Recovery Blend is included in the 20g of protein per serving until told otherwise.

      That would give us 17g of actual whey protein in each 33g scoop, but we can’t be certain how it’s being calculated. Some brands are doing it one way, some are doing it the other way.

    • The marketing claims on the new formula of Body Fortress Whey Protein

      Given the supplement facts label, this claim doesn’t add up for us

      The label is marketing “60g premium protein + 9g Super Recovery Blend” (per 3 scoops).

      However, the supplement facts section contradicts this. Again, legally, the 3g of free form amino acids should be counted as protein, per 21 CFR 101.9(C)(iii) 7 which ultimately points to protein quantification being done by the Kjeldahl method.

    • For comparison, what about the old formula’s real protein calculation?

      According to the class action lawsuit, the original formula had about 21.5g of actual dietary protein (8.5g of AA spiking).

      We cannot confirm nor deny this.

  • Carbohydrate Breakdown

    • The original formula had 7g of carbs in a 42g scoop (16.67%).

    • The new formula has 6g carbs in a 33g scoop (18.18%).

    So how did maltodextrin move behind cocoa?

    • In the new formula, maltodextrin is now behind cocoa on the “Other Ingredients” section of the label. How is that possible, given that the ratio of carbs-to-protein has gone up?

      Our guess is that Body Fortress is either using a cheaper / more inferior form of whey protein concentrate (which has more carbs inside), or they’re using less isolate… or a combination of both of those factors.

  • The amino acid profile per scoop of the non-spiked aminos is eerily similar

    …we’re just failing to see how this label meets its own claims of 20g premium protein plus 3g recovery blend.

    One could argue that the new AA profile is actually slightly worse, with just a dash less leucine. The difference is negligible, but this leads us to believe that very little has actually changed when it comes to the actual protein, once you remove the added stuff:

    • New Formula: 18.246g total from AA Profile

      In the new formula, the amino acids from the “Typical Amino Acid Profile” adds up to 18.246g. Taurine is not shown here, nor is creatine (this is normal).

      But once you take away a bit of glutamic acid (which would have been added by the 1g of free form glutamine), you arrive at roughly 17g of protein from amino acids!

      Note that this calculation might not be perfect, as glutamic acid and glutamine are not interchangeable, and glutamic acid already seems low on the amino acid profile… we’re just failing to see how this label meets its own claims of 20g premium protein plus 3g recovery blend.

    • Original Formula: 23.665g (alleged) total from AA Profile

      In the original formula, the amino acid profile allegedly totaled 23.665g, which is thrown off quite a bit due to the even-worse-spiked glutamine and glycine numbers.

    The point of this section is to ask, how does this product have 20g premium protein + 3g recovery blend when the amino acid profile is nowhere near either number?

    We are potentially missing something here, and will update this post when Body Fortress answers.

  • Real (alleged) protein totals:

    • In the original tub, you had a total of roughly (allegedly) 21.5g x 21 servings = 451.5g of protein in the entire tub.
    • In the new formula, you get a total of 17g x 27 servings = 459g of protein in the entire tub.
  • Carbohydrate totals:

    • In the original tub, you had 7g x 21 servings = 147g of carbohydrates.
    • In the new formula, you get 6g x 27 servings = 162g of carbohydrates.
  • We still have the creatine problem

    Creatine Nitrogen

    These nitrogen atoms really throw off any protein calculations using Kjeldahl (which the FDA mandates)

    Finally, creatine is still in the formula, which means that any Kjeldahl test is going to be more inaccurate in terms of measuring dietary protein. This is discussed in our original amino acid spiking article, due to Kjeldahl measuring for nitrogen, and creatine having multiple nitrogen atoms.

    Thanks to this, our protein calculations above could be wildly wrong. We simply don’t have enough information right now.

What does this mean?

In this new formula, we’ve merely gained about 7g of protein in the entire tub, while replacing some of the amino acid filler with even less effective (and cheaper) carbohydrates!!

There are several unknowns, the label seems contradictory with itself, the amino acid profile isn’t making sense, and there’s still a fair amount of creatine, which is known to ruin tests.

Is this really happening???

We can’t in our right minds recommend this product as is. Or can we?

But what if it’s a good deal?

Now here’s the thing. Fair is fair.

Body Fortress is considered a “value brand”, so when we see a more open formula like this (we still obviously have our questions), we are willing to bend if the deal is right.

For a protein powder to be reasonably priced, we’d like to get over 30g of protein per dollar. That’s currently best deal on 2lbs of Dymatize Elite Whey will fetch you as we write this, and Dymatize is a major trusted brand without any hoopla, shenanigans, or tomfoolery. So that’s our benchmark.

In this new formula, assuming the 459g of actual dietary protein, we’ll want to get this tub for $15.30 or less for it to be reasonable. Once this dips below $15 or so, we’re then happy to have a bit extra creatine. And we think Body Fortress may be up to the challenge, given some of their prices on Amazon.

At the same time, we’d still rather use something like ON 100% Whey, Dymatize Elite, or Cellucor, since they are using higher quality proteins, have less-confusing labels, and have isolate first.

Is the original formula at a reasonable price?

Body Fortress Whey Protein

Remember to calculate the TRUE grams of protein per dollar. 2lbs of protein isn’t always 2lbs of PROTEIN.

Interesting to note, the original formula, which has almost the same amount of actual protein, currently fails to achieve this “reasonable price” for us, as we look at the Body Fortress Whey Protein page on PricePlow.

A 2lb tub sounds like a good deal at $17-18, but 2lbs of protein isn’t always 2lbs of protein, as discussed above.

How can this achieve hot deal mode?

For a hot deal to get set on our supplement deals page, we’ll need to see 40g of protein per dollar. This typically happens in clearance specials, such as when a store is clearing out stock before it expires.

For this new formula to ever make it to our hot deals page, we’ll need to see it for less than $11.47. We’re not holding our breath.

Now what?

Well, if you see either of these for less than $15.00, have at it. We don’t agree with the confusing labeling practices, but fair is fair. If you still trust this company and you find it under that strike price, we won’t blame you.

Good news is that $15 does occasionally happen on Amazon, so you can always sign up for price drops and wait for it to happen.

Until then, stay tuned to our deal alerts by subscribing on the supplement deals page, sign up for price drops on our protein powder page, and check out our Whey Protein Buyer’s Guide flowchart.

Why are we here?

At the end of the day, we really don’t care what you buy or where, so long as you know what you’re putting into your body and you don’t overpay too much.

This bears repeating, though, as mentioned in the amino acid spiking article:

When we talk passionately about this situation, we don’t think about the 32 year old guy who’s making good money and hitting the weights a few times a week.

We think about the 18 year old kid who’s scraping together every last bit of his money to buy protein from a brand that he idolizes. We think about how he’s struggling to make gains and how he needs every last bit of help he can get.

He’s the one we’re fighting for. He’s the one who’s worth fighting for.

To lasting gains, The guys at PricePlow

About the Author: Mike Roberto

Mike Roberto

Mike Roberto is a research scientist and water sports athlete who founded PricePlow. He is a biohacker with extensive experience in supplementation and dietary modification, whose personal expertise stems from several "n=1" experiments done on himself.

Mike's goal is to bridge the gap between nutritional research scientists and non-academics who seek to better their health in a system that has catastrophically failed the public.

7 Comments | Posted in , | Tagged , , , .


  3. (mirror of label in #2)

Comments and Discussion (Powered by the PricePlow Forum)